VideoStance
Home
/
Bijan Bowen
/
GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2
Bijan Bowen · 36 Claims
Release and access
Neutral
GLM 5.2 has been released, but is currently restricted to coding plan subscribers.
The author states that GLM 5.2 is released, though only available to coding plan users.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Neutral
API and chatbot services for GLM 5.2 will launch next week.
He directly quotes the announcement that API and chatbot services are coming next week.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Neutral
GLM 5.2 will be open sourced under the MIT license.
He confirms the model will be officially open sourced with MIT license.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Neutral
The announcement post for GLM 5.2 is extremely short and lacks detailed information.
He notes that the post is essentially the entirety of the announcement, very brief.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Model architecture
Neutral
GLM 5.2 likely has the same parameter count as GLM 5.1 because it is an iterative 0.1 update.
He speculates that as an iterative update, the active and total parameters likely match GLM 5.1.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Neutral
GLM 5.1 was comparable to state-of-the-art models of its time.
He recalls the previous model being competitive with other top models at release.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Neutral
GLM 5.1 is a 754 billion parameter mixture-of-experts model with 1 million context support.
He states the exact parameter count, architecture, and context window of GLM 5.1.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Potential performance
Agree
If GLM 5.2 can perform well over long context lengths, it would be very valuable for an open model.
He emphasizes that strong long-context performance would benefit the open-source community.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Access
Neutral
You can access GLM 5.2 by subscribing to the coding plan.
He states that he paid for the subscription and the model is listed there.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Disagree
The coding plan subscription had lackluster performance in the past and recently increased its price.
He shares his negative experience of poor performance and a recent price hike.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
The fact that GLM 5.2 will be open source makes the subscription price more reasonable.
He argues the open-source release offsets the subscription cost.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Code generation behavior
Agree
The model's chain of thought shows detailed code checking, such as counting open and closed tags.
He observed the model verifying code structure before providing a result, indicating thoroughness.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
Watching the model's chain of thought gave confidence in the quality of the generated result.
He felt the visible reasoning process made him more confident in the outputs.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Neutral
The browser OS test generation took around 15.5 minutes in build mode.
He reports the elapsed time for creating the browser OS from build mode.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Browser OS game test
Agree
The city game result had one of the most properly city-scaled maps the author has seen.
He compares the generated city's scale favorably against other AI-generated cities.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
The generated game correctly implemented police pursuit mechanics (losing health on collision, decreasing wanted level when evading).
He verified that the gameplay matched the intended police logic from the generated code.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
The game featured proper fog implementation with buildings appearing as the player approaches.
He praised the distance-based fog effect and considered it a very good initial result.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Browser OS apps
Disagree
The Space Defender game did not work.
He found that the space game failed to launch.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
The Ether browser had a non-functional go button and a visually poor gradient, but was otherwise cool.
He noted the broken elements but concluded it was still a cool browser attempt.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
The terminal app was well done.
He described the terminal as well executed.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Browser OS feature
Agree
The hyperdrive 3D window feature was well implemented and smooth, rendering live windows in a WebGL scene.
He was impressed by the smooth 3D window management and the sci-fi aesthetic.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
C++ skate game
Disagree
The C++ skate game failed to render color on the boardwalk, which was a significant drawback.
He expressed frustration that the ground had no color, detracting from an otherwise promising scene.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
Overall, the skate game was acceptable and pleasing for an open-weight model.
After playing, he found it acceptable and was quite pleased given it came from an open-weight model.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
C++ rally game
Agree
The C++ rally game using RayLib was exceptionally well done and impressive compared to other models.
He called the result phenomenal, with a well-made map and splash screen, standing out against previous tests.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Subway scene
Agree
The static subway scene was nicely done, with well-rendered tiles.
He praised the tiling and details like varied tile colors and stripes.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
The model added extra adjustable settings (dust, flicker) beyond what the prompt required, going above and beyond.
He discovered additional interactive settings not requested, showing initiative.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Subway FPS game
Agree
The FPS game adaptation from the subway scene was well done overall, with an initial damage bug that was successfully fixed.
He noted the bug was corrected and the final game had good atmosphere, sound, and aggressive gameplay.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Watch website
Disagree
The initial watch model had incorrectly placed hands, falling short of expectations.
He found the hour and minute hands were in the wrong position, causing disappointment.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Agree
After receiving feedback, the watch model significantly improved, with correct hand positions and moving seconds.
He scolded the model, and the revised watch had accurate hands and a moving seconds hand, a big improvement.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
3D printer simulation
Disagree
The 3D printer simulation failed to extrude visible plastic and did not work.
Despite multiple attempts, no plastic appeared on the print bed, and the issue worsened after attempted fixes.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
STL model generation
Agree
The V8 engine STL model was very well done, print-ready, and impressive for an open-weight model.
He praised the design's attention to 3D printing constraints (e.g., overhang limits) and called it a respectable job.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Motorcycle game
Disagree
The motorcycle racing game struggled with bike orientation and track layout, though some components were present.
He noted the bike was backwards, the track had elevation issues, and the result was not perfect.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Drum kit
Neutral
The drum kit simulation had non-functional cymbals and hi-hat but was otherwise not bad.
He found the hi-hat and ride didn't work, limiting some grooves, but the overall model and auto-play were acceptable.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Overall assessment
Agree
Overall, GLM 5.2 is likely the best open-weight coding model currently available based on this testing.
He concludes from the tests that the model's performance is very impressive and potentially top among open-weight coding models.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Neutral
The model's one-shot generations were not extremely impressive, but it improved significantly when given a chance to self-correct.
He observed that initial outputs weren't mind-blowing, but the model excelled at fixing issues when given feedback.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Neutral
The model spends considerable time refining code after generation, similar to a meticulous barber.
He used the analogy of a barber carefully cutting every area to describe the model's thorough post-generation refinement.
Source: GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?