Agree
GLM 5.2 required additional prompting and about 15 minutes to build a complex 3D interactive Earth, while Claude Fable 5 completed it in one prompt, but the result is still extremely impressive for an open-source model.
The author shares a detailed comparison, concluding it's impressive for open-source despite the extra iterations.
Source: New #1 open-source AI model is here!Agree
GLM 5.2 outperformed Claude Fable 5 on a mechanical watch 3D animation task, succeeding where Claude Fable 5 could not get it correct.
The author says Claude Fable could not even get correct and GLM 5.2 produced an acceptable result after one error fix.
Source: New #1 open-source AI model is here!Agree
GLM 5.2 built a ray tracing simulation from scratch without external libraries, performing better than Claude Fable 5 in terms of latency and usability.
The author explicitly states he likes the result better than Cloud Fable 5, citing fewer latency issues and a fully functional simulation.
Source: New #1 open-source AI model is here!